Friday, February 27, 2015

Economy x (Vs.) Welfare = Economic Development.



Economists and business leaders have long argued that the way to improve low-income workers’ standard of living is to grow the economy. This worked for a while after World War II. However, since the early to mid-70's, productivity and national income have increased, but wages haven’t. For eg., the gross domestic product of the United States was 16.77 trillion dollars in 2013. If you break this down per person, each American produced $140,000 in goods. Yet most people only see a small percentage of this in their wages. The median wage was $27,851 in 2013 which means 50% of working adults made $27,851 or less in the United States.
If each American made half of what was produced, the median salary would have been $70,000. Now, clearly, there are other costs involved: still why aren't people paid more? Why do many jobs pay so little?

Christopher Jencks, professor of social policy at Harvard, says it’s really quite simple. He writes:
A market economy is not designed to ensure that workers get paid what other people think they deserve. The logic of the market is that a worker should be paid the smallest amount to make sure the work gets done and  is not intended to pay them what they deserve. It's not meant to pay people what would make a better life for them. It's to pay the absolute minimum that the employer can get away with. Thanks.

Monday, February 23, 2015

God Save America!

How can Gilead Sciences charge $84,000 for a drug that costs less than $300?
America is the land of breakthrough science -- and equally of health care scams. The two seem to go hand in hand in the case of the new hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure named sofosbuvir, sold under the brand name Sovaldi by the drug company Gilead Sciences. There is no question that Solvadi is a godsend- a lifesaver for millions of Americans, and perhaps someday for hundreds of millions of people around the world infected by Hepatitis C. Yet Sovaldi is also the poster child of a U.S. health care system that is being bankrupted by greed, lobbying and indefensible policies on drug pricing.
Here are the basic facts:
In Dec., 2013, the Food and Drug Administration approved Sovaldi, and another formulation, Harvoni, which is sofosbuvir used in combination with another drug. Gilead set the price for a course of 12-week treatment of Sovaldi at $84,000, amounting to $1,000 per pill. Again, Gilead set the price of Harvoni at $94,000.
According to researchers at Liverpool University, the actual production costs of Sovaldi for the 12-week course is in the range $68-$136. Indeed, generic sofosbuvir is currently being marketed by India at $300 per treatment course, after India refused to grant Gilead a patent for the Indian market.
How can Gilead Sciences charge $84,000 for a drug that costs less than $300 to produce? First, Gilead's patent on sofosbuvir runs until 2028, giving it a monopoly in the U.S. market. Second, a range of Federal and state government programs will cover the $84,000 for a sizeable number of patients. For those not covered by government programs, some will be covered by private insurance, a few will pay out of pocket, and still others will likely die because they lack coverage and can't afford the treatment. God Save America!

Religion- 3

Do Las Vegas (the Gambling Capital) Churches accept gambling chips? This may come as a surprise to those of you who are not used to the ways of religion. Believe me, there are more churches than casinos in LA. Not surprisingly, some worshipers in Sunday services give casino chips rather than cash as offerings when the basket is passed. Since these churches get chips from many different casinos, they have devised a method to cash them. These churches send all the collected casino chips to a nearby monastery for sorting and then the chips are taken to the respective casinos (of origin) to cash in. This is done by the chip- priests, as they are called. You never thought this could ever happen, right?
Like ·  · 

The Silk Road(s)

China's “slower economic activity" still means a staggeringly impressive annual growth rate of 7% which is now the globe’s leading economy. Internally, an immensely complex economic restructuring is underway as consumption overtakes investment as the main driver of economic development. At 46.7% of the gross domestic product (GDP), the service economy has pulled ahead of manufacturing, which stands at 44%.
Geopolitically, Russia, India, and China have just sent a powerful message westward: they are busy fine-tuning a complex trilateral strategy for setting up a network of economic corridors the Chinese call “new silk roads” across Eurasia.
Meanwhile, Moscow and Beijing are at work planning a new high-speed rail- remix of the fabled Trans-Siberian Railroad. And Beijing is committed to translating its growing strategic partnership with Russia into crucial financial and economic help, if a sanctions-besieged Moscow, facing a disastrous oil price war, asks for it.
To China’s south, Afghanistan, despite the 13-year American war still being fought there, is fast moving into its economic orbit, while a planned China-Myanmar oil pipeline is seen as a game-changing reconfiguration of the flow of Eurasian energy.
And this is just part of the frenetic action shaping what the Beijing leadership defines as the New Silk Road Economic Belt and the Maritime Silk Road of the twenty-first century. We’re talking about a vision of creating a potentially mind-boggling infrastructure, much of it from scratch, that will connect China to Central Asia, the Middle East, and Western Europe. Such a development will include projects that range from upgrading the ancient silk road via Central Asia to developing a Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar economic corridor and a new maritime silk road that will extend from southern China all the way, in reverse Marco Polo fashion, to Venice.
Don’t think of this as the twenty-first-century Chinese equivalent of America’s post-World War II Marshall Plan for Europe, but as something far more ambitious and potentially with a far vaster outreach.
Like ·  · 
  • Prof. Alex Odikandathil Ph.D. For all the ambitious talk, details remain scarce on how this vision will be implemented. Will the land- and sea-based Silk Roads be limited to a string of bilateral agreements between China and individual countries, or between China and regional groups like the European Union and ASEAN? Is there a grander vision, such as a regional free trade zone incorporating all the Silk Road countries? Or will China be the tie that binds it all together, with no special agreements directly linking, say, Kazakhstan and Germany? Yet to be seen. The Silk Road is envisioned to create not just an economic trade route, but a community with “common interests, fate, and responsibilities. The Silk Road represents China’s visions for an interdependent economic and political community stretching from East Asia to western Europe, and it’s clear that China believes its principles will be the guiding force in this new community in the new era. “China’s wisdom for building an open- world- economy and open international relations is being drawn on more and more each day,” Xinhua (official press agency of the People's Republic of China), wrote.

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Happy Valentine's day!

Hey, its Valentine's Day and our entire thoughts revolve around romance.
Falling in love, or failing to do so, can literally transform a person.

See how Dr. Larry Young and Brian Alexander explain it in 'The Chemistry Between Us': "When neuro- chemical circuits in our brains are activated, we're flooded with elation and the whole world seems brighter. It turns out that all kinds of love- for friends, family, and lovers- are induced by a similar brain function.

Unfortunately, many of our cultural myths, from fairy tales to rom- coms, paint a very distorted picture of love. In stories, love is projected as a static reward- you go out and find your prince or princess, overcome whatever obstacles the world throws in your way, and achieve a state of romantic happiness. Believe me, love is not the pot of gold waiting at the end of our quest incarnated in a single perfect partner. Instead, it's something that we need in every step of our way- Love energizes, encourages and guides.

Love is, perhaps, the most powerful drug mankind is aware of.
Happy Valentine's day!

*******************************************************************************

Sunday, February the 15th, 2015.

And here follows my observations on a post- Valentine's day: 
Living with a manipulative partner is like walking on a minefield. You can’t relax, you can’t just love them for who they are, and you’ll always have to be on guard. And that’s not really t
he recipe of a happy relationship, is it? If you can’t feel care- free happiness in your lover’s arms, is it worth staying in that relationship?
If your partner doesn’t try to change even after you’ve given them enough chances, walk away for good. Chances are, their manipulative behavior is too deeply ingrained in their mind to (ever) change. And you’re better off leaving the relationship, than letting this person break your spine and your morale, which would only lead you to getting used and manipulated by everyone else in your life. (Note: Manipulation is a behavior pattern in which one person tries to change the mind of another person without confronting them directly. Manipulators use deception, trickery and threats to get what they want from people who are willing to give in to them. God-men, god- women, church hierarchy and religious organizations are all examples of super- manipulators).



Friday, January 23, 2015

Religion- 2

Early death:
In today's world that is armed with pipe bombs and machine guns and drones and nuclear weapons, we don’t need defenders of religion’s status quo- we need real reformation, as radical as that of the 16th Century and may be, much broader. It is only by acknowledging religion’s worst ideas that we have any hope of embracing the best. Ironically the mindset that our sacred texts are perfect, betrays the very quest that drove our ancestors to write those texts. Each of the men who wrote part of the Bible, Quran, or Gita took his received tradition, revised it, and offered his best articulation of what is good and real. We can honor the quest of our spiritual ancestors, or we can honor their answers, but we cannot do both.
“Because the faith of Islam is perfect, it does not allow for any innovations to the religion,” says a young Muslim explaining his faith online. His statement betrays a lack of information about the origin of his own beliefs. But more broadly, it sums up the challenge that all religions face in moving forward. Imagine if a physicist said, “Because our understanding of physics is perfect, it does not allow for any more innovations in the field.” Perfection in itself is a utopian idea. Even emperors need maids to cook and engineers to build; nothing is complete in itself.
Some of humanity’s technological innovations are things we would have been better off without: the medieval rack, the atomic bomb and powdered lead potions are just a few. Religions tend to invent ideas or concepts rather than technologies, but like every other creative human enterprise, they produce some really bad ones along with the good. Here is one of the worst of humanity’s moral and spiritual concepts: blasphemy. This dubious concept promotes conflict, cruelty, suffering and death rather than love and peace. To paraphrase Christopher Hitchens, it belongs to the dustbin of history just as soon as we can get it there. Blasphemy is the notion that some ideas are inviolable, off- limits to criticism, satire, debate, or even question. By definition, criticism of these ideas is an outrage, and that is precisely the emotion the crime of blasphemy evokes in believers. The Bible prescribes death for blasphemers; the Quran does not, but death-to-blasphemers became part of Shariah during medieval times.
The idea that blasphemy must be prevented or avenged has caused millions of murders over the centuries and countless other horrors. As I write this piece, blogger Raif Badawi awaits round after round of flogging in Saudi Arabia- 1000 lashes in batches of 50- while his wife and children plead from Canada for the international community to do something. What a horrid shame!
Adherents who think their faith is perfect, are not just naïve or ill-informed. They are developmentally dwarfed and in the case of the world’s major religions, they are anchored to the Iron Age: a time of violence, slavery, desperation and early death.
Like ·  · 

Religion-1

The Arabic din signifies an entire way of life. The Sanskrit dharma is also “a total concept: untranslatable covering law, justice, morals, and social life.”
The Oxford Classical Dictionary firmly states that no word in either Greek or Latin corresponds to the English ‘religion’ or ‘religious'. The idea of religion as an essentially personal and systematic pursuit was entirely absent from classical Greece, Japan, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Iran, China, and India. Nor does the Hebrew Bible have any abstract concept of religion. If the Buddhist non- violence is spoken about, soon we hear that Buddhism is not a religion but a secular philosophy. Our world is dangerously polarized as humanity is more closely interconnected- politically, economically, and electronically than ever before. People from different strata of society- from American commentators to psychiatrists and from London taxi drivers to Oxford academics- reiterate that religion has been the cause of all major wars in history.