Saturday, April 27, 2013

Foul Language

On abusive language
Even if many individual expletives have lost their potency through overuse, the issue of swearing divides the nation into those who see it as the last refuge of the ignorant and linguistically indolent and those who regard it as an art form and a badge of social acceptability. Cursing has a proud heritage in England, going back to the days of Chaucer, who – unrestrained by the dead hand of the censor – sprinkled his work with obscene words such as ferte, erse, pisse, shiten, queynte, collions (testicles), and swyve, the precursor to f***, which arrived around 1500.

And although vulgarity is often associated with shipyard and factory workers, it has long had its middle-class exponents, particularly in literature. Shakespeare was an enthusiastic blasphemer – his plays containing plenty of religious obscene words such as zounds- or God's wounds- which were in common usage at the time.
Gradually, as the world became more secular, religious swear words gave way to the sexual ones that are in use today, their popularity driven, once again, by writers, such as DH Lawrence, James Joyce, Henry Miller and Dylan Thomas. Since the 1960s, rock stars have rallied to the cause, with the likes of Bob Geldof, Madonna, Liam Gallagher and Lily Allen: all doing their bit to make them more acceptable- foul language is so integral a feature of today's culture, it barely registers. Native English users may be able to bring about an effect by the right timing of those words.

On a personal level, I tell you, swearing gives a poor impression, endangers relationships and sets a bad example. On a broader level, it contributes to the dumbing down of society and can lead to violence. The reason is that swearing still offends many people, influences the way they judge your intelligence and character, heightens conflicts at home and at work, and represents a decline in civility. So stay away from using profanity and mind your words for you live in a civilized society.

See also,
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dd/Seven_Dirty_Words_WBAI.jpg/220px-Seven_Dirty_Words_WBAI.jpg

Thanks.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

The Meaning of Suffering and Theological BS




bullshit meter cartoon by nakedpastor david hayward

This cartoon speaks for itself. But I have a few words to add.
After the bombing at the Boston Marathon on Monday last, as expected, the theological BS started to flow. What is even more remarkable is that every theological chunk of BS resembles the theological pronouncements of Job’s comforters. Job’s comforters and their theologizing only added to his suffering. Stupid theological statements add to ours. We should know better.
You suffer because there’s sin in your life. And even if there isn’t any sin really outstanding, you’re still not perfect. And even if you do call on God for help, the fact that you are proud prevents God from answering. And even if we don’t understand it fully, we can count on the fact that you are suffering in order to make you a better person because even though God is just he is also a God of love. Blah blah blah.
The whole point of Job, which I consider to be the most honest book about suffering, is that there is no meaning. Job never gets an answer. He never finds out why he suffered. In fact, his comforters are rebuked! Even though their theology is sound it is wrong. And Job is vindicated! He was right to claim his innocence and cry “Unfair!” because it was unfair. He never discovers the 'why'. Maybe that’s a good thing because we, the readers, know that it was just a wager between God and Satan. It was all just a game. So even the meaning is meaningless.
I think the point of Job we should walk away with is that we cannot understand suffering. If there is a meaning to it, we cannot know it. But what we can do, like Job and his comforters did, is be friends and help one another.
People suffered in Boston. We can’t understand why such things happen. But we can bring comfort and help to one another. 
As was so admirably done... Thanks.