When it comes to climate change, any discussion of "cap and trade" legislation usually generates a lot of controversy, but there is another proposition for tackling our global warming woes that should be causing even more friction: the little-known set of futurist techno-scenarios collectively known as geoengineering. At the opening plenary of the Convention on Biological Diversity last week in Nagoya, Japan, the ETC Group- the same civil society outfit that led the charge for an international ban on Monsanto's infamous "terminator seed" a decade ago- called for a moratorium on geoengineering experiments. The group's new report, Geopiracy: The Case Against Geoengineering calls geoengineering, "a political strategy aimed at letting industrialized countries off the hook for their climate debt."
This emergent set of planetary-scale technologies is attracting millions of dollars in investment; it is high on the research agenda at the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the UK's Royal Society; and it is being promoted by the scientists behind it as "the only practical way to protect biodiversity." At the same time, theWashington Post has called it, "Playing God with the weather," and a leading indigenous peoples' organization called it "an assault on the sacred."
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change defines geoengineering as, "The deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment." David Keith, a leading proponent, gave the definition a touch more animus when he noted, "Climatic geoengineering aims to mitigate the effect of fossil fuel combustion on the climate without abating fossil fuel use; for example, by placing shields in space to reduce the sunlight incident on earth."
The mental image conjured by "shields in space" begins to put flesh on the bones of what geoengineering is. Keith's declaration that a key objective of geoengineering is to maintain the status quo of fossil fuel use tells us its principal intent, and begins to hint at what its critics consider to be the grave error at the heart of the approach. Faith Gemmill, an indigenous woman from Arctic Village, Alaska and Director of REDOIL (Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands) says, "Geoengineering is a way for scientists to remain in denial and for governments to avoid responsibility."
The Shape of Things to Come:
Geoengineering technologies fall into three categories: Weather Modification, Solar Radiation Management, and Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration; each is already under intensive research, computer modeling and experimentation.
The first category, Weather Modification - generally covering "chemical cloud seeding" and "storm modification" (the redirecting of hurricanes) - is, conceptually, the mother of all geoengineering technologies, already practiced in significant scale in the U.S. and China. In the words of the ETC Group Report, such techniques demonstrate "a classic 'end-of-pipe' response that addresses neither the causes nor the mechanism of climate change, but seeks only to alter its outcomes."
May be I'll continue later, but my question to you this morning is:
What is your take on the new spin? shall we be averse to progress and turn our back to the new approach, in an effort to hold on to our faith?
Enjoy the rest of your week.
Love,
Prof. Dr. Alex Abraham Odikandathil
No comments:
Post a Comment