The fascinating reason why it's so hard to quit bad habits.

Bribe, corruption & favoritism- Do these have a scientific base to

refuse indulgence?

There is a fascinating reason why it's so hard to quit bad habits like

smoking and alcoholism; by extension bribe, corruption & favoritism.

If you stop engaging in a bad habit, the habit will gradually diminish

until it disappears from your life - False.

Any time you quit something cold turkey, your brain will make a

last-ditch effort to return you to your habit - True.

You’ve been there, perhaps more than once.

You get serious about losing weight and start watching every calorie.

You read labels, stock up on fruit and vegetables and hit the gym.

Everything is going fine. You feel great. You feel like a champion.

You think, “This is easy.”

One day you give in to temptation and eat some candy, or a doughnut,

or a cheeseburger. Maybe, you buy a bag of chips.

You order the fettuccine alfredo.

That afternoon, you decide not only will you eat whatever you want,

but also will celebrate the occasion by eating a pint of ice cream.

The diet ends in a catastrophic binge.

What the hell?

How did your smooth transition from comfort food to human dumpster happen?

You just experienced an "extinction burst."

Once you become accustomed to reward, you get really upset when you can’t have it.

Food, of course, is a powerful reward. It keeps you alive.

Your brain didn’t evolve in an environment where there was an abundance of food,

so whenever you find a high-calorie, high fat, high sodium source, your natural

inclination is to eat a lot of it and then go back to it over and over again.

If you take away a reward like that, you throw an internal tantrum.

Extinction bursts are a component of extinction, one of the principles of conditioning.

Much of your behavior is the result of conditioning.

It is among the most basic factors shaping the way any organism reacts to the world.

If you get rewarded by your actions, you are more likely to continue them.

If punished, you are more likely to stop. Over time, you begin to predict reward and

punishment by linking longer and longer series of events to their eventual outcomes.

If you want some chicken nuggets, you know you can’t just snap your fingers and wait

for them to appear. You must engage in a long sequence of actions – acquire language,

acquire money, acquire car, acquire clothes, acquire fuel, learn to drive, learn to use money,

learn where nuggets are sold, drive to nuggets, use language, exchange money, etc..

This string of behaviors could be sliced up into smaller and smaller components if we

wanted to really dig down into the conditioning you have endured in order to be able to

get nuggets in your mouth.

Just driving the car from point A to point B is a complex performance which becomes

automatic after hundreds of hours of practice. Millions of tiny behaviors, each one a

single step in a process, add up to a single operation you have learned will payoff in reward.

Think of rats in a maze, learning a complicated series of steps – turn left two times,

turn right once, turn left, right, left, get cheese.
Even microorganisms can be conditioned to react to stimuli and predict outcomes.
For a while in psychology, conditioning was the cat’s pajamas.

In the 1960s and ’70s, Burrhus Frederic Skinner became a scientist celebrity by scaring

the shit out of America with an invention called the operant conditioning chamber –

the Skinner Box.

The box is an enclosure which can have any combination of levers, food dispensers,

an electric floor, lights and loudspeakers. Scientists place animals in the box and

either reward them or punish them to either encourage or discourage their behavior.

Rats, for example, can be taught to push a lever when a green light appears to get food.
Skinner demonstrated how he could teach a pigeon to spin in circles at his command by

offering food only when it turned in one direction. Gradually, he withheld the food until the

pigeon had turned a little farther and farther until he had it going round and round.

Hence my question to you:

Will they kick the habit of bribe, corruption and favoritism, once they are into it and have

accepted it as a reward? Will the thief stop his successful practice?

How far is Anna Hazare from his goal of a corruption-free India?

Thank you and enjoy the rest of your week.

Love,

Adv. Alex Abraham Odikandathil