Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Not many questions:

1. In a case where the accused doesn't plead guilty and the case goes on trial, on whom does the onus of proof rest so as to establish the innocence of the accused?
2. Is it the prosecution's duty to prove alibi as claimed by an accused?
3. Oommen Chandy (CM) and Thiruvanchoor (HM) defended Kurien by saying that the abused girl has nothing to say new.
Is that not the strongest point to prove that the Suryanelli girl is speaking truth?
(Its customary for defence lawyers to get witnesses tell different versions of the same incident by tactful cross- examination to disprove their statements and to cast doubt on their character. Here she is telling the same thing again and again which tantamounts to truth in my legal disposition. Who else is competent to say what happened to her better than she herself)?
4. What is Antony's take on this since he was the then CM?
5. Why did two left governments prefer to sleep on this issue when they were in power?
6. To what extent does the balance swing in favour of the girl due to the revelations in the Special Proseutor's (Adv. Janardana Kurup) autobiography?
7. Heard the dictum: "Justice delayed is justice denied?"
An introspection is good.
1Like ·  · Promote · 

No comments:

Post a Comment