This tantamounts to Genocide:
Besides country mechanisms wherein human rights situations are examined and monitored, its the duty of The Commission on Human Rights to monitor and report on major phenomena of human rights violations worldwide (known as thematic mandates). Which other situation in the entire world is direr at the given moment than the Mullapperiyar issue wherein a good part of the state with many lives will be washed away and until that happens, those people will have to expend their lives in perpetual fear? Just like a whole lot of people sentenced to capital punishment with the clock ticking; yet unaware of the date or time.
The Human Rights division of the U.N. is also expected to uphold and protect the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. "To the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights one more might, with relevance, be added. It is 'The Right to Refuse to Kill.' ", declared Sean MacBride, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Nobel Peace Prize Laureate (1974).
Can we, as a state avow it and refuse the Supreme Court's verdict to increase the water-level is the question I want to raise for I think it is court-sponsored holocaust - the only difference is murder by water and not fire or gas chamber.
Mullapperiyar, another extermination camp and the Supreme Court, yet another Einsatzgruppen?
Thanks.
Besides country mechanisms wherein human rights situations are examined and monitored, its the duty of The Commission on Human Rights to monitor and report on major phenomena of human rights violations worldwide (known as thematic mandates). Which other situation in the entire world is direr at the given moment than the Mullapperiyar issue wherein a good part of the state with many lives will be washed away and until that happens, those people will have to expend their lives in perpetual fear? Just like a whole lot of people sentenced to capital punishment with the clock ticking; yet unaware of the date or time.
The Human Rights division of the U.N. is also expected to uphold and protect the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. "To the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights one more might, with relevance, be added. It is 'The Right to Refuse to Kill.' ", declared Sean MacBride, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Nobel Peace Prize Laureate (1974).
Can we, as a state avow it and refuse the Supreme Court's verdict to increase the water-level is the question I want to raise for I think it is court-sponsored holocaust - the only difference is murder by water and not fire or gas chamber.
Mullapperiyar, another extermination camp and the Supreme Court, yet another Einsatzgruppen?
Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment